A private tennis court is one of the few features that is unambiguous: it either exists and is playable, or it does not. Surface, net, fencing and drainage are all checkable, and we check them.
The interesting economics are upkeep — resurfacing, nets and fencing age on a visible clock — and the constraint they can impose: a court occupies a large, flat, sunny plot that some future owner may wish to use differently. New courts need consent; existing ones carry no promise for their next decade.
What we'd check before a viewing.
- Resurfacing and fencing costs are material; inspect before valuing.
- A court is not permission to build another, and its own status may be conditional.
- Courts need level, open ground; on sloping sites check how that was achieved.
Evidence before adjectives.
Physical features are recorded as facts with sources, dates and ownership distinctions — a workshop is a building we can describe, not a promise of what you may do in it. When a recorded property carries this feature, we show it on the property page with its source.